Is AI The Fight Club of Legal Technology and eDiscovery?

on Mon, Dec 02, 2019 By | Tom O'Connor | 0 Comments | Future Of eDiscovery
Artificial Intelligence has become the biggest buzz word in legal technology since, well the last biggest buzzword. ECA, TAR, Blockchain, Analytics, Big Data, Collaboration, Disruption, Innovation. Every 6 months we have a new “big thing” and right now it’s AI.
Read More

How to Develop a Discovery Plan

on Tue, Nov 19, 2019 By | Alison ONeill | 0 Comments | Attorney Requirements
eDiscovery can make or break your case. It establishes the scope of the lawsuit for both sides, the documents that must be produced, and the custodians to contact, among other important factors. In essence, the discovery process lays out the rules that lawyers must abide by during a lawsuit as they pertain to gathering, preserving, and sharing relevant documents. A single misstep at this stage could create a competitive disadvantage that will be all but impossible to overcome during the course of a lawsuit or trial.
Read More

What You Need to Know About FRCP Rule 26

on Tue, Oct 29, 2019 By | Alison ONeill | 0 Comments | Attorney Requirements
Discovery is a critical phase of any trial or lawsuit, and can make the difference between a successful case and one that goes horribly awry. Lawyers and attorneys on both sides of a lawsuit have a number of obligations to meet during the discovery process, which are extensively detailed in Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Read More

5 Steps To Create A Stellar eDiscovery Document Production

on Mon, Oct 14, 2019 By | Jeremy Greer | 2 Comments | Best Practices
Step 1: Understand Your Obligations and Requirements The party to which a document production request is directed must disclose all documents and ESI relevant to a legal investigation with the exception that documents can be withheld due to privilege. Rule 34a of the Federal Rules of Civil Prodecure (FRCP) states that a party may serve on any other party a request [to produce documents and esi] so long as that request isn’t unduly burdensome according to Rule 26b.
Read More

How To Sleuth Your Way To An Accurate eDiscovery Data Map

on Mon, Aug 05, 2019 By | Jeremy Greer | 0 Comments | Best Practices
A data map is a structured analysis of the target company's sources of data which could be potentially relevant to a legal investigation. During an eDiscovery project, the identification stage is about gaining a complete understanding of this data map and how it relates to the organizational (org) chart. Some companies will have a data map, an org chart and specific data retention policies already prepared and in place. These practices can vary between companies and even between departments. When litigation becomes imminent, you may be in a rush to send out a legal hold to prevent intentional or unintended destruction of data. The ordering of tasks in eDiscovery is not as important. Regardless, it is a best practice to put together an accurate data map and continue to revisit it, thereby adding and removing data sources as you gain a more thorough understanding of the data and formally define the scope of the investigation.
Read More

eDiscovery Software User's Guide to a Quick, Defensible Privilege Log

on Tue, Jun 04, 2019 By | Jeremy Greer | 0 Comments | Best Practices
The most important right which lawyers establish between them and their client is privilege. In order to assert privilege and withhold potentially relevant documents, the attorney or litigation support professional must fill out a privilege log associated with each document. The withholding party must provide enough information so that the reviewing attorney of the opposing party can fairly determine whether the document is privileged. There are four main types of privilege which can be claimed by an attorney - Attorney Work Product, Attorney-Client, Attorney Advice and Joint Defense.  Privilege is essential, tricky, and can be lost easily. Creating privilege logs and asserting privilege is a tedious chore of great importance with heavy consequences for misuse. It is arduous to say that a document is privileged and thereby claiming that there are relevant documents but you are going to withhold them. Legal professionals must spend 2, 3, 4 minutes per document simply asserting privilege. This task is crucial, as under-asserting privilege could lead to giving up privilege for all documents. At the same time, over-asserting could lead to a time consuming in camera review or an expensive redo of your eDiscovery project.  
Read More

eDiscovery Key Terms

on Tue, May 28, 2019 By | Jeremy Greer | 0 Comments | Best Practices
This eDiscovery key terms list is the first step in understanding our tool. Our key terms are sequenced to highlight the timing in which each process will arise in your workflow.  
Read More

Sample Electronic Discovery Document Production Request

on Wed, Apr 17, 2019 By | Robert Powell | 0 Comments | Sample Agreements
According to Rule 34 of the FRCP, a party in litigation may serve on any other party a request for production of relevant documents. This request must specify with reasonable particularity each item or category of new items to be inspected. The request must also specify the form in which ESI is to be produced. Here in this blog, we provide a sample request which defines the form of production. Aside from this, you will also need to keep in mind other requirements in rule 34 and rule 26 in which you must discuss other issues relating to, specificity, the eDiscovery process, timing and production delivery/accessibility.
Read More

eDiscovery And People Metadata In The Age Of Surveillance Capitalism

on Tue, Mar 26, 2019 By | Bill Gallivan | 0 Comments | Future Of eDiscovery
For many years, litigators have relied on the probative value of document metadata to define gross relevancy, pinpoint the who what and when of essential facts and shape ESI request before during and after 26(f) conferences.  More recently, our legal community has employed artificial intelligence to analyze document metadata and complex word associations (word vectors) and predict what is important and relevant to the resolution of our clients' disputes.  It doesn’t matter what you call our new document and metadata analysis tools; Artificial intelligence (AI), Predictive coding or TAR 2.0, the results are clear.  New technologies allow litigators to deliver more effective, efficient and inexpensive dispute resolution.  Document metadata and AI has moved us 1 step closer to the prime directive of civil procedure, Rule #1, Just, Speedy and Inexpensive client services.
Read More

Document Review: Efficiency vs Granularity

on Tue, Mar 12, 2019 By | Jeremy Greer | 0 Comments | Best Practices
Digital WarRoom is an eDiscovery software platform that provides the capability for law firms and legal departments to perform robust document review. Once you preserve and collect all the data that could be potentially relevant to your investigation, you should process it into an eDiscovery tool. This will involve extracting all possible metadata as well as indexing the words in your files. Once all your data is processed, the main role of eDiscovery software is to help you cull the data and make a range of decisions on each document. We call this your “attorney work product”. As you mark documents, add descriptions and create privilege logs, you are creating metadata which will now be associated with each document.
Read More

Subscribe To Monthly Blog Distribution List

Checklist-Manifesto-Banner
The content on this blog is not intended to be legal advice.

Subscribe To Monthly Blog Distribution List